Analysis of the Shouting Match Between NAHCON Boss and Commissionersq
A recent meeting between the National Hajj Commission of Nigeria (NAHCON) officials and Vice President Kashim Shettima at the Presidential Villa in Abuja turned heated, with the NAHCON Chairman, Professor Abdullahi Saleh Usman, and commissioners engaging in a shouting match.
General observations
The dispute began when Professor Usman accused the three commissioners - Aliu Abdulrazak, Abubakar A. Yagawal, and Prince Anofi Elegushi - of throwing him under the bus during the meeting with Vice President Shettima. Usman claimed that the commissioners undermined his authority, and the Vice President's directive to have all NAHCON decisions approved by the commissioners and state chief executives was a vote of no confidence in his leadership.
Allegations and Counter-Allegations
The commissioners fired back, accusing Usman of sidelining them and implementing policies dictated by outsiders and family members. They also alleged that Usman's brother and nephew treated official files and appended signatures on his behalf. These allegations suggest a deeper issue of governance and accountability within NAHCON.
Implications of the Meeting
The meeting was convened to discuss the 2025 Hajj exercise and matters arising. However, the outcome revealed that Usman was blamed for all the problems in NAHCON, and the Vice President's brutal frankness took all attendees by surprise. The Vice President denied knowledge of decisions taken allegedly at his behest, further straining the relationship between Usman and the commissioners.
Qqqqqqqqqqqq
- Leadership Crisis: The shouting match highlights a leadership crisis within NAHCON, with Usman's authority being questioned by the commissioners.
- Governance Issues: The allegations of sidelining and implementing policies dictated by outsiders and family members raise concerns about governance and accountability within NAHCON.
- Vice President's Intervention: The Vice President's directive to have all NAHCON decisions approved by the commissioners and state chief executives may be seen as a move to restore balance and accountability within the commission.
Overall, the incident suggests that NAHCON is facing significant challenges, both internally and externally. The commission's ability to function effectively and efficiently may be compromised if these issues are not addressed promptly.¹
Comments
Post a Comment